The panel has put out 195 recommendations on a rolling basis since its creation at the beginning of the last Congress, and it plans to hold one more markup before the committee dissolves at the end of this term. “It wasn’t the Kilmer-Renacci bill, even though we wrote it together.” “It was the Kilmer bill,” the Washington Democrat said. Though the pair spent months crafting it, the legislation bore only Kilmer’s name. But he pointed to one elections bill he worked on with former GOP Ohio Rep. They weren’t all holding the pen,” Kilmer said. “There are bills that get introduced with 150 original co-sponsors. While members can always sign on to a piece of legislation as an original co-sponsor, it’s not the same as seeing your name get top billing. Kilmer sounded enthusiastic about the two-name proposal and said sponsorship can be a point of pride. The panel prides itself on comity and requires a supermajority to make recommendations, though it doesn’t have the power to move actual bills. Timmons, R-S.C., and Derek Kilmer, the panel’s chairman, said they felt it was important to revisit the recommendation as part of the committee’s push to make Congress a more civil and collaborative space. Right now, only one name can appear as a first sponsor on a bill, which means some lawmakers are left feeling they didn’t get credit where credit was due.įour Republicans had voted against the recommendation in December and two members missed the vote, denying the eight votes required to approve it. The idea is to boost bipartisanship and spread around the glory. The catch: Each member of the pair must come from a different party. Two lawmakers at a time should be allowed to list their names as first sponsors on a bill, according to that recommendation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |